Send Email
Visit Our Office
Confidentiality Guaranteed
Confidentiality Guaranteed
New Delhi, September 15, 2026: The investigation into the killing of gym trainer Vijay Kumar in South Delhi’s Aya Nagar has taken a new turn following an alleged social media post claiming responsibility for the murder.
The post has reportedly been attributed to gangster Himanshu Bhau, although authorities are examining its authenticity. The claim has not been independently confirmed by the police and is therefore being treated as part of the ongoing investigation.
Investigators are also looking into the possibility that the killing may have been linked to an old personal or family dispute in the area.
Vijay Kumar, a gym trainer in South Delhi, was allegedly attacked after being called outside a gym in the Aya Nagar area under Fatehpur Beri police station jurisdiction.
According to media reports, two motorcycle-borne attackers allegedly opened fire at him. Vijay suffered multiple gunshot injuries and was later declared dead.
The manner of the attack has led investigators to examine whether Vijay was specifically targeted.
Police are working to identify the attackers and establish the circumstances that led to the shooting.
Reports indicate that Vijay was inside the gym when he was allegedly called outside.
After he came out, the attackers reportedly opened fire before fleeing from the area.
The exact sequence of events is still being reconstructed by investigators.
CCTV cameras installed around the gym and nearby roads could prove important in determining how the suspects arrived, how long they remained in the area and which route they used to escape.
The investigation gained another dimension after a social media post allegedly claiming responsibility for the killing surfaced online.
The post has reportedly been linked to gangster Himanshu Bhau.
However, the authenticity of the post has not yet been independently established.
Investigators may examine the account from which the post originated, its digital history and other available technical evidence to determine whether it is genuine.
A social media post alone cannot establish a person’s involvement in a criminal case. Authorities must verify its source and establish a connection with the actual perpetrators through evidence.
Along with the alleged gang angle, police are reportedly examining a possible old personal or family rivalry.
According to reports, Vijay’s family has suggested that an existing dispute in the area could be connected to the killing.
The family has also reportedly maintained that Vijay himself did not have any known personal enmity.
Investigators will have to determine whether the murder was directly connected to this alleged rivalry or whether another motive was involved.
CCTV footage from the gym and surrounding areas could become one of the most important pieces of evidence in the case.
Investigators may examine footage to establish:
The identities or appearances of the attackers
The motorcycle or vehicle used during the crime
The route taken by the suspects
Whether anyone was accompanying the shooters
Whether the suspects had visited the area before the attack
Their movements before and after the shooting
Footage from nearby streets and establishments could also help investigators reconstruct the suspects’ movements.
At this stage, several possible angles are being examined.
These include:
Personal rivalry
An old family dispute
A possible criminal gang connection
A planned targeted attack
The authenticity of the alleged social media claim
The identity of the shooters
Possible involvement of other people in planning the crime
The final motive will become clearer only after investigators establish the facts through evidence.
The circumstances surrounding the attack have raised questions about whether Vijay was deliberately targeted.
If investigators establish that the attackers knew his location and waited for him to come outside, it could indicate that the assault was planned.
However, such a conclusion would require supporting evidence.
Investigators are expected to examine Vijay’s recent activities, known disputes, contacts and movements to determine whether he had received any threats or was involved in any ongoing dispute.
The alleged social media claim has prompted attention toward a possible criminal network connection.
However, authorities would need to establish several links before such a theory could be confirmed.
These could include the identities of the shooters, communication between suspects, financial or personal connections and evidence showing whether the murder was ordered or facilitated by someone else.
Until such evidence emerges, the alleged gang connection remains an investigative angle rather than a confirmed fact.
The investigation is likely to focus on identifying and locating the shooters.
CCTV footage, witness accounts, forensic evidence and digital information could help investigators establish the sequence of events.
If suspects are arrested, questioning could provide further information about the motive, planning and possible involvement of other individuals.
The alleged social media post may also become significant if investigators are able to establish who created it and whether it has any genuine connection to the murder.
The killing of gym trainer Vijay Kumar in Aya Nagar, South Delhi, has raised several questions about the motive and planning behind the attack.
The alleged social media claim attributed to gangster Himanshu Bhau has added a new dimension to the case, but its authenticity still needs to be established.
At the same time, investigators are examining a possible old personal or family rivalry.
For now, the exact motive, identity of the attackers and any possible involvement of a criminal network remain under investigation.
Further developments are expected as police continue examining CCTV footage, digital evidence, witness statements and other leads connected to the case.
Disclaimer: This report is based on information available in media reports and ongoing investigative developments. Allegations and unverified social media claims have not been presented as established facts. Any accused person is presumed innocent unless proven guilty by a court of law.
